Heat not burn products

The first heat not burn product on the UK market was Ploom, released by Japan Tobacco International (JTI) in 2014. Phillip Morris International (PMI) began selling its heat not burn product, IQOS, in the UK in late 2016. Other tobacco transnationals have also developed heat not burn devices, such as British American Tobacco (BAT) which have Glo and iFuse as part of their portfolio, however these have yet to be launched officially in the UK. Whilst there are other devices in the UK market that can vapourise tobacco leaf which are not produced by the tobacco transnationals, they do not appear to be widely used at present.

Tobacco 19997 1280 Banner 2

What is a heat not burn product?

Heat not burn products use compressed tobacco in a ‘mini-cigarette’ form in a vapouriser. Unlike electronic cigarettes which vapourise nicotine suspended in a liquid, a heat not burn device heats and vapourises actual tobacco, meaning they must be considered as tobacco products. Unlike ordinary cigarettes, however, no combustion of the tobacco takes place.

Prevalence of heat not burn products

Sales of heat not burn products are substantial and rapidly growing in Japan, accounting for 5.5% of the cigarette market according to the most recent estimates. At present in the UK, however, knowledge and usage of heat not burn products is low. According to a 2017 YouGov survey1 on behalf of ASH only 11% of a sample of GB adults had heard of heat not burn devices, whilst the most recent Smoking Toolkit Study (STS)2 found a very low usage of heat not burn products among their sample (<1% of past year smokers). This is likely to change in the future as these devices become more commonplace in the market.

Cigarette 1178541 1599X1066

Consequences of using heat not burn products

Given much of the harm caused by smoking is a result of the by-products of tobacco combustion it is possible that heat not burn products will be proved to be less harmful than smoked tobacco, given they do not possess this combustion element. At present however there is insufficient evidence to reach this conclusion. Almost all the research on heat not burn that currently exists has been undertaken by the tobacco industry. Because of the long record of tobacco industry manipulation and deceit over scientific and medical evidence the UK Government will need expert advice on the emerging evidence on heat not burn and other novel tobacco products. Many within the public health community are calling on the UK Government to establish an independent expert committee to examine not just the toxicity of heat not burn devices relative to conventional tobacco cigarettes, but also the broader health and related social impacts of heat not burn products. For instance, do they act as a gateway to tobacco smoking among non–smokers?; and/or do they renormalise smoking as an activity? Further independent research is required to provide answers to these questions.

1  The survey was carried out online by YouGov for ASH; the total sample size was 12,696 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between 16th February 2017 and 19th March 2017. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all GB adults (aged 18+). The sample was split in half, with half asked about awareness of ‘heat not burn’ as a category.

2  Each monthly wave involves a new sample of approximately 1,800 respondents and detailed questions are asked of the approximately 500 respondents who report having smoked in the past year (‘last-year smokers’).